All Posts
SafetyFeb 25, 20267 min read

New Matter Detection in Patent Amendments: How AI Prevents 35 USC 132 Violations

Introducing new matter through claim amendments can invalidate claims and create prosecution estoppel. This is the #1 risk of using AI for patent prosecution without proper safeguards.

What Is New Matter Under 35 USC 132?

35 USC 132 prohibits introducing new matter into a patent application through amendment. New matter is any subject matter that is not described in the original specification, claims, or drawings as filed. This includes adding limitations, structural relationships, ranges, or functional descriptions that were not part of the original disclosure.

Why New Matter Is Dangerous

  • Examiner issues a new matter rejection (35 USC 132), wasting an OA round
  • Creates prosecution history estoppel that narrows claim scope
  • Can make claims unenforceable if not caught and corrected
  • Potential malpractice liability for the filing attorney

Common New Matter Traps in AI-Assisted Amendments

Specificity inflationHigh risk

AI adds specific numbers, ranges, or dimensions not in the specification. Example: "a plurality of sensors" becomes "at least four sensors" when the spec only says "multiple sensors."

Structural relationship insertionHigh risk

AI adds spatial or structural relationships between components that are not described. Example: "connected to" becomes "directly connected to via a bus interface" when the spec does not describe the connection mechanism.

Functional language expansionMedium risk

AI adds functional capabilities or use cases not in the original disclosure. Example: "processing data" becomes "processing data in real-time using parallel threads" when the spec does not mention real-time or threading.

Combined limitation synthesisMedium risk

AI combines features from different embodiments into a single claim that was never described as a unified embodiment. The individual features have support, but their combination does not.

Drawing-sourced limitationsMedium risk

AI draws structural details from drawings that are not described in the specification text. While drawings are part of the disclosure, inferring precise dimensions or relationships from drawings that the spec does not describe is risky.

How Abigail Detects New Matter

Abigail's 10-expert pipeline includes a dedicated new matter detection layer that runs automatically on every proposed amendment:

  1. 1AI generates candidate amendment language from the 10-expert pipeline
  2. 2Each amendment term and phrase is searched against the original specification text
  3. 3Structural relationships in amendments are verified against described embodiments
  4. 4Numerical values and ranges are checked against specification support
  5. 5Combined limitations are verified as described together (not just individually)
  6. 6Glass Box validator flags any unsupported language with the reason and specification gap
  7. 7Attorney sees: the proposed amendment, the verification result, and the closest specification support (if partial)

Amendments with New Matter Protection

Upload an Office Action and see amendment suggestions with automatic new matter verification. Every amendment checked against your specification.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Guides